January 3, 2013

Anonymous asked: Don't you think it's a bit racist that Obama (and liberals) think minorities are SO stupid they can't take care of themselves and need all this government help to take care of them. Yet conservatives are they racist ones. Blows my mind every time I think about it.

Yes. It’s the bigotry of low expectations.

January 3, 2013

Anonymous asked: You're a disgrace. A man can walk around with his shirt off, so a woman should be able to as well. Because we have fucking mammary glands in our chest, does not we are to be sexualised you sexist piece of shit. You are a twenty four year old male who cannot understand this. Grow the fuck up.

^ Doesn’t understand human sexuality. Can’t communicate without profanities. Tells me to grow up.

January 3, 2013
Yes it does, that’s why I do it :-). Thank you very much.

Yes it does, that’s why I do it :-). Thank you very much.

8:06pm
  
Filed under: fanmail 
January 3, 2013

Anonymous asked: Were you not held enough as a child?- Or perhaps held,,,,too much?

I was held so much that it’s amazing I didn’t turn out to be a pantywaisted, spoiled liberal.

January 3, 2013
"We shootin’ white people in this movie. The black dude leaves with his girl into the sunset. There can be no happier movie than that."

Actor Donnell Rawlings in reference to the movie “Django Unchained”

_____________________________________

I can relate, brotha! 

I remember watching old Star Trek reruns and every-single-time one of the black crew members beamed down to the surface with Kirk, we knew he was going to be killed but, we also knew, Kirk would get laid while leaving his black crewman to die.  Happy happy show.

(via talkstraight)

January 3, 2013
Boehner Telling Reid to “GFY”? Not a “BFD”

For all the complaints we conservatives have about Speaker John Boehner, there can be no denying that we felt a certain camaraderie with him, a certain pride that he is on our side, at least in party affiliation, when we learned that he told Senate Majority Leader Harry Read to “Go f*** yourself”—twice—after Harry Reid likened him to a dictator.

“John Boehner seems to care more about keeping his speakership than about keeping the nation on firm financial footing,” said Reid, adding that the House was “being operated with a dictatorship of the speaker.”

Politico reported that Boehner muttered his awesome rebuke the next day, when Boehner saw Reid at the White House.

Reid, taken aback, said, “What are you talking about?”

And Boehner repeated it.

Boehner’s office has confirmed the validity of these claims, but offered no further comment on the matter.

For maybe six seconds after hearing of this incident, I wanted Boehner to run for president. That quickly faded, of course, but it’s still nice to see Boehner have at least some backbone, even if in such a way that’s irrelevant to his leadership.

But whenever a Republican does something classless—and I don’t deny it was classless of Boehner to tell Reid to self-mate—liberals suddenly become virgin-eared nuns.

“Go F” was trending on Twitter Wednesday morning, with liberals reporting on the matter and then editorializing that it was “unprofessional” of Boehner, or saying sarcastically that it was “real classy.”

The Twitter account of NorthDecoder.com wrote, in part, “Republican Civility = Go F__k Yourself.” But what, it’s not uncivil for Vice President Joe Biden to call Tea Partiers “terrorists”? It’s not uncivil for the President to accuse his opponent in his re-election bid of giving women cancer and wanting women to die? It’s not uncivil for him to say, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun”?

When President Obama was signing his healthcare legislation and Joe Biden muttered loudly into his ear and into the microphone, “This is a big f***in’ deal,” liberals thought it was the greatest thing they’d ever heard. There was no sniveling from the left about Biden’s lack of professionalism.

The difference is that Boehner was not in a congressional session—it was overheard by others, but it was still a private conversation. Joe Biden was in a professional environment, an official ceremony of sorts. Not that I care either way; I don’t.

But even more unprofessional and classless than Biden’s BFD moment and Boehner’s GFY moment was when Obama’s campaign website decided it prudent to sell t-shirts to capitalize on the crassness. The shirts read, “Health Reform Still a BFD.”

Now if the Republican National Committee starts printing and selling t-shirts that read something along the lines of “Hey, Reid, GFY!,” then I’ll complain about that. But a private moment between two individuals? Get over it.

January 3, 2013

(Source: whoneedsfeminismdotorg, via socialjusticefails)

January 3, 2013
As opposed to what, figuratively hoping I rot in hell? Of course you mean “literally”; that’s the only one that makes sense. You can’t figuratively hope for something.
What you should have said is you hope I literally rot in Hell, not that you literally hope I rot in Hell.
Public education, folks. This is what it has done to our youth.

As opposed to what, figuratively hoping I rot in hell? Of course you mean “literally”; that’s the only one that makes sense. You can’t figuratively hope for something.

What you should have said is you hope I literally rot in Hell, not that you literally hope I rot in Hell.

Public education, folks. This is what it has done to our youth.

January 3, 2013

Anonymous asked: So I really don't understand you. It seems that say that you have the freedom to say whatever you want but then try to silence others that call you out on your racist/sexist/etc. shit. So it's only freedom of speech on your end, but when others respond to it, they don't have that right? It doesn't work that way. People who are offended have just as much right to say what they want as well. Welcome to diversity.

What the heck are you even talking about? I don’t try to silence others, you moron. That’s why I even allow brave liberals to ask me things anonymously.

January 3, 2013
Aww, another run-with-the-flock Tumblr liberal, challenging none of the beliefs he’s told to hold, accepting authority’s word on everything. How precious.
Yeah, I’m a conservative. Isn’t diversity great?

Aww, another run-with-the-flock Tumblr liberal, challenging none of the beliefs he’s told to hold, accepting authority’s word on everything. How precious.

Yeah, I’m a conservative. Isn’t diversity great?

January 3, 2013

January 2, 2013
Fiscal Cliff Deal: Proof, Once and for All, that Democrats Cannot Compromise

In the wee morning hours of New Years Day, the Senate passed the new bill to avert the “fiscal cliff.” They stonewalled up until then to create the illusion for the public that they swooped down in their superhero capes at the last minute to save the day.

And all the talk over the past few months about Republicans’ refusal to compromise can now, finally, after seeing what kind of deal the Democrats gave them, be tossed into the BS bin; the agreement reached shows, if anything, that Republicans are the greatest compromisers we’ve ever seen and Democrats are the worst we’ve ever seen.

What is the compromise?

Democrats: Hey, GOP, have we got a deal for you!

Republicans: Go on.

Democrats: You’re gonna love this. Okay, for every $41 that you guys agree to raise taxes by, we Democrats will cut spending by—get ready for this, you’re gonna love it—a dollar!

Republicans: Wow, that’s incredible! We’ll take it!

Yes, that’s right: the deal reached has the President increasing taxes by $620 billion and agreeing to cut only $15 billion in spending, a 41:1 ratio of taxes to cuts. So the problem of too much spending, which almost everyone, including Democrats, agrees is a major problem, is to be put on the back burner and worried about some other time because Democrats are so sexually aroused by the idea of taxing people that it inhibits their ability to reason.

(Note that Senators Marco Rubio and Rand Paul, my dream 2016 presidential ticket, both voted No on the deal, adding another notch to their conservative credentials.)

This is not the only instance of Democrats’ being slimy weasels and Republicans’ being weak pushovers. From Americans for Tax Reform:

In 1982, President Reagan was promised $3 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax hikes. The tax hikes went through, but the spending cuts did not materialize. President Reagan later said that signing onto this deal was the biggest mistake of his presidency. In 1990, President George H.W. Bush agreed to $2 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax hikes. The tax hikes went through, and we are still paying them today. Not a single penny of the promised spending cuts actually happened.

So what is likely to happen, if history is any indicator, is that we will never see the $15 billion in spending cuts promised by the Democrats and Obama. Not that it was anything to write home about in the first place.

Happy New Year.

January 2, 2013

pearlsandalexandrites asked: I was reading through your blog and decided it was perfect. Just thought I'd share.

Well thank you, kiddo!

1:54pm
  
Filed under: fanmail 
January 1, 2013

January 1, 2013
To Clinton’s Health in the New Year

Well, Hillary Clinton is back in the hospital again, this time from a blood clot. Due to some shoddy reporting from NBC, it’s unclear if it’s the doctors who don’t know where the clot is or if it’s just the public who don’t know where the clot is, but in the end, I don’t know where the clot is, so I cannot tell you.

A doctor (whether Clinton’s doctor or just a random doctor, I’m unclear, again thanks to NBC’s news staff) told NBC that it is uncommon for blood clots to arise out of a concussion, and that the more likely explanation is that the clot is in her limbs from lying in bed for so long. I’m more inclined to guess that he is not Clinton’s doctor, otherwise he would know where the clot is, wouldn’t he? Is it possible to know someone has a clot but not to know where it is?

So Clinton got the flu, which made her throw up, which made her dehydrated, which made her lightheaded, which made her collapse, which made her bonk her head, which made her lie in bed for a week, which (possibly) gave her a blood clot—all of which kept Clinton from testifying on Benghazi, thus delaying the truth from reaching the public before everyone forgets about it. (I wonder, if Clinton were a private citizen, would she have been put under arrest for skipping out on giving testimony?)

Regardless of what we think of the woman—and I know we don’t hold her in very high regard, to put it as kindly as I’m willing—let us hope, possibly pray, that the anticoagulants Clinton’s doctors have put her on help her and that she does not die anytime soon. This is not a political consideration, the desire that she not die simply because we haven’t heard her testimony; it is a human consideration: she is a mother and a wife, and we conservatives are better than liberals not only in our politics, but in the way we treat humans; we don’t wish death upon or rejoice in the death of our political adversaries.

So, here’s to Clinton’s health in the New Year. May her daughter get to keep her as a mother, and may her husband get to keep her as a wife-on-the-side.

[Update: The New York Times is reporting that the blood clot is between Clinton’s skull and brain, behind her right ear. She is expected to make a full recovery.]

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »