May 24, 2013
Armed Woman to Burglar: “Put Your Face in the Dirt!”

This is one of those stories that make me whoop like a high-school varsity tool, just as any story would that involves a woman, empowered by a gun, commanding a burglar to put his face in the dirt or else lose his face entirely.

Such is the type of woman who feminists in decades gone by would draft as the poster child of their movement of independence and strength and equal protection under the law. Since feminism has been mutated into only a means to a Marxist society, however, and private gun ownership hinders that mutation, such a woman is no longer eligible to be the National Organization for Women’s Role Model of the Year (if such an annually bestowed title exists; I’m not sure because I don’t care about NOW).

Betty Collins had received an early-morning phone call from her boyfriend on his way to work, warning her to be wary of a suspicious-looking shirtless man in the neighborhood. Shortly before 5 a.m., a shirtless man began kicking Collins’ front door. She rushed downstairs towards the action instead of staying upstairs and cowering under the sheets. What gave her this courage?

A freakin’ gun, man, that’s what! Ba-BAM!

So she rushes to the front door and shouts through it as loud as she can, “Get off my porch! I have a gun! I will shoot you!”

Know what the knucklehead did then? Well, apparently he thought she was bluffing and that he had nothing to fear, because he stayed right there at the front door.

She repeated her warning one final time. When he still wouldn’t leave, Collins threw open the door and, as she so beautifully put it, “there he was, standing five inches from the barrel of a loaded .357.”

If you’re a liberal, this is where your mind explodes. If you’re a conservative, you understand it completely and you know exactly what comes next: Betty can now exert her power over the man who tried to take away her sanctuary. So that’s exactly what she (awesomely) did.

Collins told the young man, 31-year-old Kyle Caldwell, to get on the ground. So he got on his knees. (And here I like to imagine he temporarily lost bladder control and piddled a bit.)

“No,” she said, “put your face in the dirt, and you’re gonna stay there!” Because the man had more understanding than most liberals that guns give the wielder the upper hand, he did exactly as she commanded him. 

Betty Collins is alive because, plain and simple, the punk was afraid of the gun.

Liberals: Weeping into their chai tea lattes that the would-be burglar didn’t grab the gun from her and shoot her, which surely would have been beneficial to their argument that women, when overwhelmed by fear, are too incompetent to handle guns.

Gun-rights advocates: Happy that their persistent activism kept this woman alive.

May 23, 2013
Romney to female heckler: “Why don’t you sit down…?”

I can see it now: A female heckles President Romney during his speech. He tries addressing her, but she keeps interrupting. Finally, he says, “Why don’t you sit down and I will tell you exactly what I’m going to do.” And the liberal refrain will be, “Romney is a sexist! He said to a woman, ‘Why don’t you sit down’! This is just like the Fifties!”

But Obama said it, actually, so no big.

(Source: theblaze.com)

May 23, 2013

criquiznos:

So I am currently participating in an event called One Dress, One Shirt, One Month where participants wear one piece of clothing for the entire month of April. These dresses and shirts are supposed to represent the 300,000 women and children who are currently victims of sex trafficking in the US (and 27 million globally). We ask people for monetary donations and hope that wearing the same thing everyday will get people to ask what’s going on so we can raise awareness. Our total monetary goal is $2,834, which is the cost for The Hope House (a North Carolina organization devoted to helping sex trafficking survivors) to support 1 girl for 1 month.

I chose to wear a dress because I figured it would get more attention and people would be more inclined to ask. It was a bit outside of my comfort zone at first, I get so many stares wherever I go and someone yelled “Queer” from their car once, but then I just compared my experience with victims of sex trafficking and thought, “Suck it up.”

If you want to get more info, donate $$$$, or want to start something like this at your school next year, feel free to message me or drop by here http://fundly.com/onedressoneshirtonemonth

Why not just wear a shirt that says “300,000 women and children are used in sex-trafficking. Contact The Hope house to donate”? Does dressing unnecessarily humiliatingly make you feel like you’re struggling as well, and therefore you’re more righteous than someone simply wearing the aforementioned T-shirt?

Liberals love being victims. And affecting a pigeon-toed stance.

May 15, 2013
Liberal Priorities: Outrage over “Makeover” for Disney Princess

Because liberals are usually feelers instead of thinkers, they more easily than conservatives get caught up in the romantic, brainless crap called popular culture. A recalibration of their priorities is in order, especially in light of a recent outrage of theirs: a makeover of the Disney-Pixar character Merida, the heroine of last summer’s Brave

Before being officially inducted into the Disney Princess family, Disney is giving Merida an ever-so subtle character redesign that entails a tangled and wiry mess of fire-orange hair becoming slightly less tangled and wiry, and her already tiny waist becoming a pinch thinner.

This prompted a liberal to create a petition on the website (a liberal one, as indicated by the feel-good domain name) Change.org. The petition reads, in part:

The redesign of Merida in advance of her official induction to the Disney Princess collection does a tremendous disservice to the millions of children for whom Merida is an empowering role model who speaks to girls’ capacity to be change agents in the world rather than just trophies to be admired.

I hate (love) to be the one to break it to you morons, but Merida doesn’t exist. She isn’t real. How about this: don’t seek fictional cartoon characters to be role models for your children, yeah? Your kids can never strive to be a female warrior who battles with bears and performs physics-defying somersaults. And if you insist on your kids’ role models being fictional, why can’t you create your own? 

You know who was a “change agent,” and certainly no visual “trophy”? Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, whose recent death liberals celebrated with utmost jubilance. And the added benefit of her being a role model for kids is that, you know, she’s real; she isn’t the product of some filmmakers’ imaginations.

The petition continues:

Moreover, by making her skinnier, sexier and more mature in appearance, you are sending a message to girls that the original, realistic, teenage-appearing version of Merida is inferior; that for girls and women to have value—to be recognized as true princesses—they must conform to a narrow definition of beauty.

You mean the narrow, feminist definition of beauty that says you must be homely to be taken seriously? Are all the smokin’-hot babes out there with naturally unblemished skin and silky hair not “real”? Are they unworthy of being looked up to just because they’re sexy, no matter how great their personal character is?

The character of Merida will still have the same character traits in any future portrayals of her. The only difference will be that oversensitive feminists will strain their eyes to pick out the few subtle differences in her appearance; kids won’t notice a darn thing because they won’t have been corrupted to only focus on people’s appearances and judge them thereby, as these petitioning feminists do.

But it’s good to get on record what incites liberals to impassioned action. Not a denial of a request for security that ultimately killed four Americans; not fascist intimidation by the government through the IRS in order to silence peaceful dissenters; but the character design of a Disney princess.

April 30, 2013
Prostate Cancer and Feminism

From an article at Taki’s Mag, by Gavin McInnes:

Prostate cancer kills only about 10,000 fewer people than breast cancer yearly. We supposedly live in a sexist patriarchy where evil men dominate poor, helpless women. But if you think prostate cancer should get at least 75% of the attention breast cancer does, somehow you’re trivializing women’s suffering.

April 24, 2013

(Source: creepwalkers, via conservativism)

April 24, 2013
Frankly, as “misogynistic” as I am said to be, I really have no qualms with females talking about masturbation.
This is where I will now be called a misogynist—because I AGREE with the feminist who wrote this.
Feminists want to be able to talk about masturbation without men also wanting them to talk about masturbation. It’s like, “Hey, you can’t agree with me! That’s sexist!”

Frankly, as “misogynistic” as I am said to be, I really have no qualms with females talking about masturbation.

This is where I will now be called a misogynist—because I AGREE with the feminist who wrote this.

Feminists want to be able to talk about masturbation without men also wanting them to talk about masturbation. It’s like, “Hey, you can’t agree with me! That’s sexist!”

(Source: whoneedsfeminism)

April 21, 2013
A Self-Identified Progressive Feminist Opposes the Violence Against Women Act

Specifically Title IX, which does away with the presumption of innocence. Her son was accused of rape, and the VAWA assumes guilt and lays the burden on the accused to prove they are innocent, rather than the burden being on the accuser to prove guilt.

Naming a bill something so benevolent-sounding as the “Violence Against Women Act” makes people automatically assume it’s a good bill. It discourages people from actually analyzing the contents of the bill, judging it solely by its cover. Much like how Obama was elected, and by the very same people who put no analytical thought into anything. “Affordable Care Act? That sounds awesome! I support it! Violence Against Women Act? I’m against beating up women. Sure, I’ll support that bill!”

Article here.

April 20, 2013
A Nation of Promiscuous Prudes (#1)

Excerpted from this op-ed:

Decades after the rise of feminism, popular culture still seems confused by it. If women should be able to approach sexuality like men, does it follow that commentary about sex should follow the same gender-neutral rules? Yet wearing provocative or inappropriate clothing is often considered less offensive than remarking upon it. Calling a near-nude Madonna onstage a “hussy” or “tart” would be considered crudity in a way that her mock crucifixion and simulated sex acts are not.

April 13, 2013
Heidi Klum made the choice (choice!) to profiting off of her almost-naked body. If she wanted to be taken seriously, she wouldn’t have gone into the business of intentionally causing men to fantasize about her. Leave her alone, feminists.

Heidi Klum made the choice (choice!) to profiting off of her almost-naked body. If she wanted to be taken seriously, she wouldn’t have gone into the business of intentionally causing men to fantasize about her. Leave her alone, feminists.

(Source: whoneedsfeminism)

April 6, 2013
Sexual assault isn’t legal, moron. Also, if whatever your gyno is doing to you is approved by you before he does it, it’s not assault. Even if he karate chops your vagina but you gave him permission, that’s not assault.

Sexual assault isn’t legal, moron. Also, if whatever your gyno is doing to you is approved by you before he does it, it’s not assault. Even if he karate chops your vagina but you gave him permission, that’s not assault.

(Source: whoneedsfeminism)

March 20, 2013
If all feminists want is equality between both sexes, I’m sure they’ll start endeavoring to either raise the life expectancy of males or lower the life expectancy of females; to ban women from colleges until there are an equal number of males; and to make themselves homeless so that their homeless numbers match that of the males.

If all feminists want is equality between both sexes, I’m sure they’ll start endeavoring to either raise the life expectancy of males or lower the life expectancy of females; to ban women from colleges until there are an equal number of males; and to make themselves homeless so that their homeless numbers match that of the males.

(Source: factualwiley, via conservativealpaca)

March 18, 2013

Anonymous asked: There's a difference between wanting women to be able to walk around shirtless like men because of the double standard, and you wanting us shirtless so you can stare at our tits.

Well, pick one: do you want us to look at your boobs or not? If not, then wear a shirt. If men don’t want women to stare at their abs and pecs, men must make the same decision.

March 18, 2013
Feminism
Feminist: I wish we lived in a society in which women could walk around shirtless, like men can.
Me: Trust me, so do I.
Feminist: Sexist!
February 21, 2013

(Source: youngcardinal, via joshua-garcia)

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »