May 12, 2013
[Anon is referring to this post.]
English is the second-most common language in the world, and that’s behind Mandarin. If Nigerians can send jeremiads via email in broken English, surely janitors can be expected to have at least a passing knowledge of the language. How stupid do you think janitors are that their English can’t advance even to the level of Nigerian con artists? Ah, the liberal racism of low expectations!
The quote I used is directly from CBS. Direct your whining to them.

[Anon is referring to this post.]

English is the second-most common language in the world, and that’s behind Mandarin. If Nigerians can send jeremiads via email in broken English, surely janitors can be expected to have at least a passing knowledge of the language. How stupid do you think janitors are that their English can’t advance even to the level of Nigerian con artists? Ah, the liberal racism of low expectations!

The quote I used is directly from CBS. Direct your whining to them.

May 12, 2013
[Anon is referring to this post.]
“The least among us” is what liberals think of those people, as evidenced by the fact that they are always trying to known the rest of us, the successful, indeed, this country as a whole, down a few pegs so that we are not “unfairly” better than the other countries.

[Anon is referring to this post.]

“The least among us” is what liberals think of those people, as evidenced by the fact that they are always trying to known the rest of us, the successful, indeed, this country as a whole, down a few pegs so that we are not “unfairly” better than the other countries.

May 11, 2013
School Only Uses English in Official Notices; Spanish-Speaking Janitors Sue

If it is not the goal of liberalism, it is certainly the end result: a backwards, ignorant society. The following story accents the ignorant.

Twelve Hispanic janitors at the Auraria Higher Education Center in Denver, CO, are biting the hand that feeds them in suing the school that, although it did not have to hire them, did anyway.

The complaints are threefold, and each issue could have been avoided had the janitors taken it upon themselves to learn English. And that is not my conservative slant on it; take it from one of the complainants herself, a Ms. Bertha Ribota, who acknowledged that the problem is hers and hers alone when she said, “If I could speak English, I wouldn’t have the problems that exist.” Right on the money, Ribota!

(It is my own personal hunch that after reading that quote, many will warm to the idea of no longer permitting low-IQ immigrants into the country.)

The complaints range from, one, being surprised to see that their paychecks had undergone a three-percent cut—a cut they signed off on (it cannot be said that this is not their fault, because it is only their fault; learn the language, and don’t sign anything before reading it); two, a notice of a scheduling change that went unread, of course, because they were posted in English, the language we speak here in America; and three, a ”minor injury” not detailed in the local CBS affiliate’s report (and the only injury mentioned in the story at The Denver Post’s website is  a needle prick, an “injury” that gives hefty credence to the belief that liberals are literally thin-skinned).

So what happened is that Ribota deduced and accepted that the cause of her problems is her ignorance of the English language, but then, in truly liberal fashion, joined a lawsuit with eleven other Hispanics to make somebody else pay for the problems she admits stem from her own ignorance!

There is no law in Colorado that requires all official documents and notices be bilingual. A good thing, for to make such a law would open the door for further lawsuits by speakers of those languages that are not accounted for—Somalian, for instance, or Telugu. Keep it simple—one language, the language that has been here since this country’s nascent days—and then people will know that English is the language to learn if they don’t want to run into trouble.

But this is liberalism, that we must lower ourselves to the level of the least among us. In the case of these janitors who did not know the language of the country whose benefits they elected to partake when they moved here, we must suffer the consequences of their willful ignorance. Ignorance because they were without a working knowledge of the language, and willful because while they certainly had the means to learn it, they elected not to. I suspect this is because the Democratic Party tells them they don’t have to; that the rest of America must cater to the immigrants’ lack of knowledge; that if a misunderstanding occurs as a result of the immigrants’ willful ignorance, they can rest assured that the natural-born citizens will pay the price.

April 28, 2013
Chechens Coming Home to Roost

From an article over at Taki’s Mag:

The Tsarnaev Brothers lived in the absolute heart of liberal intellectual America—in Cambridge, Massachusetts, less than two miles from both Harvard and MIT. Therefore, you can be confident that they were never instructed that they owe anything to the country that let them in.

April 28, 2013
Why can’t Hispanics be patriotic Americans?

From an article called “Chechens Coming Here to Roost” at Taki’s Mag:

The notion that a Republican politician could stand up and ask Mexican-American voters to demonstrate their loyalty to America by voting against illegal immigration because it is, on the whole, bad for their fellow American citizens is simply unthinkable today. Asking Mexicans to think in sophisticated legal terms such as “citizen” instead of crude biological terms such as “race” has become too advanced for today’s advanced thinkers.

April 25, 2013
"The problem isn’t just illegal immigration. I would rather have doctors and engineers sneaking into the country than legally arriving ditch-diggers."

— Ann Coulter, in a column about how our legal-immigration policy is also crappy

April 25, 2013
The Unfortunate Dilemma of Dzokhar’s 6th Amendment Rights

There are many realities we conservatives wish were or were not so. We wish, for example, to see everybody freed from the indignity of government dependency. We wish this country could have been so lucky as to have been blessed with a President Barry Goldwater. And we wish President Bill Clinton would stop hitting on our moms. 

Conservatives have quite a few qualms on our lists, which might be one explanation as to why Fox News Channel is consistently, every night, the most-watched cable news network.

If we are to be taken seriously, we must acknowledge the unfortunate realities regardless of how unfortunate they may be. The one that comes to my mind, considering recent events, is the reality that Dzokhar Tsarnaev, the younger of the two Boston Marathon bombers, and currently the only living one, is an American citizen.

I don’t want that primate to be an American citizen. I wish it were not true that he, in a showcase of his oh-so-wicked sense of humor, received his citizenship on the eleventh anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks that his fellow Islamic savages committed. 

But he is an American citizen and therefore he does have the right to the benefits guaranteed in the Sixth Amendment: the right to a lawyer in a “speedy” and “public” trial.

We cannot “stand with Rand” in his 13-hour filibuster against the use of drone technology on accused terrorists if they are also American citizens, but then abandon this principle when the Obama administration says basically the same thing regarding trials for accused terrorists who are also American citizens. We would be hypocrites to support one and not the other.

However, we wouldn’t have this dilemma if Dzokhar and his goat-loving brother were never granted citizenship in the first place. What we need is a stricter immigration policy, one with higher standards.

If you’re a foreigner living in Mexico, for example, you can be deported for not being ”physically or mentally healthy,” or if you lack ”necessary funds” for ”sustenance.”

Why shouldn’t America, considering the economic and moral upheaval it’s currently undergoing, adopt Mexico’s deportation laws as its own immigration laws? If you are physically or mentally unhealthy—certainly mentally—what good will you be to our country? If you want to move here but have no way of providing for yourself, why should we take you in? You will just add to our financial burdens, and that affects everyone else.

America simply can’t afford to be letting every single person and his uncle into the country just because they want to, even if they go about it the legal way. We should, at least for the time being, only accept “the best and the brightest.” And especially, in light of our allowing the brother of an Islamist once the subject of an FBI investigation to become a United States citizen on the anniversary of one of America’s bloodiest days (those Islamists are suckers for symbolism), there is really no reason we should have such low standards for our immigrants.

April 20, 2013

(Source: conservativealpaca)

April 3, 2013
"[T]he Associated Press…will no longer use the term ‘illegal immigrant.’…They will now use the phrase ‘undocumented Democrat.’"

— Jay Leno

March 20, 2013

(Source: obamadawn)

February 7, 2013
More like share if you love.

More like share if you love.

(Source: guns-and-humor, via everythingwithaconservativetwist)

February 1, 2013
Marco Rubio Is a Big, Dumb Idiot

Marco Rubio is a big, dumb idiot. His participation in the bipartisan group of senators known as the Gang of 8, formed to draft immigration-reform legislation, is moronic.

The first clue for Rubio that this Gang, like the majority of gangs, is bad news should have been the only clue needed, and that is that Sen. Chuck Schumer is on Rubio’s side. That’s not just a red flag, that’s a screaming siren. If Chuck Schumer supports Rubio’s plan, then he, Schumer—a well-practiced politician to Rubio’s rookiehood—must know, or at least believe, that this plan will ultimately help Democrats.

Here’s something I’ve never said before: Schumer is right. As Rubio explains it, he will only support what amounts to amnesty if our Mexican border is first secured. His support is “dependent” on securing the border, okay? But the first step in his and his gang’s legislation is the legalization of the roughly 11 million illegals already here. So there goes the “dependent on border security” claim.

I understand where Rubio is coming from—recognition that Republicans need to be more appealing to Hispanics to win their votes—but he’s a big, dumb idiot if he thinks the borders will be made secure after Democrats have gotten a taste of approximately 11 million new voters.

Plus, Republicans will not get credit for the amnesty in the Gang of 8’s proposal, because it will be noted that other congressional Republicans had to be dragged kicking and screaming to vote for it (if they do vote for it). In addition, as noted at National Review, John McCain had ”an established record for supporting amnesty [but] could not muster one in three votes from…Hispanic citizens” in the 2008 elections.

Rush Limbaugh once proposed an amnesty plan that I can get behind: we’ll grant pardon for their crimes of trespassing (amnesty in a nutshell), but all those who receive that pardon will be prohibited from voting for 25 years. Though I’d go even a step further: Those illegals broke the law, so they need a penalty. Amnesty removes that penalty. And the only reason Democrats want amnesty is because they’ll gain 11 million new voters and 11 million new people dependent on and beholden to the government. So what I would say to an illegal is, fine, you’ll get your amnesty, but the penalty for your crime, since you received no penalty otherwise, is no voting rights at all. Of course not one single Democrat, as a member of that Party that pretends to care about the well-being of the illegals here, will vote for the well-being of illegals if it means those illegals can’t vote. “Screw their well-being, I want votes!”

Rubio’s big-dumb-idiocy is a sobering reminder that no politician is perfect. Heck, even Ronald Reagan dabbled in amnesty. Rubio needs to learn the ways of Washington without becoming a Washingtonian. If he believes a Democrat’s promise to secure the border after enacting amnesty, he is far too naive to be a presidential candidate in 2016.

January 24, 2013
Distribution of wealth hurts charities. And it hurts economies, which hurts the middle and lower “classes.” Distribution of wealth is theft. It is selfishness with other people’s money. Liberals are only charitable with other people’s money. That’s not selflessness, that’s greed and theft.
Animals should not be tortured. No conservative believes they should. No non-sociopath thinks they should be treated badly. But they are not equal to humans. They are not our equals. If you’re an evolutionist, you must accept that it’s okay to eat animals. If you believe in the Bible, you must accept that it’s okay to eat animals.
You don’t want to protect future generations, you want to steal from them to satiate your immediate desires. The earth has warmed up 0.0006 degrees in the last hundred years. It was hotter 400 years ago than it is now. The Earth has cooled over the last 10 years.
Conservatives are open to immigrants. But law-abiding ones. We want immigrants—who follow the law. If it weren’t for big government (which liberals love), there wouldn’t be such a huge bureaucracy and all that red tape that makes it harder for immigrants to come here and encourages illegal immigration. Conservatives aren’t against immigration. My God, I can’t believe you allowed yourself to be spoon-fed that crap from the TV.

Distribution of wealth hurts charities. And it hurts economies, which hurts the middle and lower “classes.” Distribution of wealth is theft. It is selfishness with other people’s money. Liberals are only charitable with other people’s money. That’s not selflessness, that’s greed and theft.

Animals should not be tortured. No conservative believes they should. No non-sociopath thinks they should be treated badly. But they are not equal to humans. They are not our equals. If you’re an evolutionist, you must accept that it’s okay to eat animals. If you believe in the Bible, you must accept that it’s okay to eat animals.

You don’t want to protect future generations, you want to steal from them to satiate your immediate desires. The earth has warmed up 0.0006 degrees in the last hundred years. It was hotter 400 years ago than it is now. The Earth has cooled over the last 10 years.

Conservatives are open to immigrants. But law-abiding ones. We want immigrants—who follow the law. If it weren’t for big government (which liberals love), there wouldn’t be such a huge bureaucracy and all that red tape that makes it harder for immigrants to come here and encourages illegal immigration. Conservatives aren’t against immigration. My God, I can’t believe you allowed yourself to be spoon-fed that crap from the TV.

January 16, 2013

(Source: obamadawn, via southern-conservatism)

October 17, 2012

Anonymous asked: What do you think about illegal immigrants? My friend was saying elderly illegal immigrants shouldn't be deported because they've lived their whole lives here, but I just kinda went with, "Rules are rules; you can't be so empathetic as to give special treatment to them. That's not equality." I am curious about your position on this and would like to hear your thoughts.

Well, you’re right. If I steal someone’s gold coins and then fifty years later the person I stole it from finds me and wants the coins back, is it reasonable for me to say, “Hey, I’ve had these almost my whole life, ever since I stole them from you fifty years ago. I’m keeping them”? No, it’s not rightfully mine to begin with. Likewise, people who break the laws and cheat LEGAL immigrants by cutting in line—this isn’t their country. If they come here ILLEGALLY, then they are not American citizens and they have no right to be here. If they don’t want to be deported, they shouldn’t have committed a crime that they knew to be punishable by deportation. And for those kids who were brought here illegally by their parents, no, we shouldn’t deport them. But we should tell the parents, “Look, either you take your kid back to wherever you came from and come back the LEGAL way, or you put your kid up for adoption here in America while YOU go back to wherever you came from and come back the legal way.” Or maybe a third option would be to say, “Okay, you came here illegally with your kid. I already gave you two options, now here’s a third: you both can stay here, but you can never ever become citizens of this country. We will create a permanent record for you that shows that you are a criminal who broke into the country, and if a business doesn’t want to hire you, that’s their choice.” Something like that.

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »